When The Centralizers Lie

Centralizers and Their Lies

When they lie, nothing happens. So, they keep doing it.

‘Absolute liars’: Ex-D.C. Guard official says generals lied to Congress about Jan. 6

A former D.C. National Guard official is accusing two senior Army leaders of lying to Congress and participating in a secret attempt to rewrite the history of the military’s response to the Capitol riot.

In a 36-page memo, Col. Earl Matthews, who held high-level National Security Council and Pentagon roles during the Trump administration, slams the Pentagon’s inspector general for what he calls an error-riddled report that protects a top Army official who argued against sending the National Guard to the Capitol on Jan. 6, delaying the insurrection response for hours.

Matthews’ memo, sent to the Jan. 6 select committee this month and obtained by POLITICO, includes detailed recollections of the insurrection response as it calls two Army generals — Gen. Charles Flynn, who served as deputy chief of staff for operations on Jan. 6, and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt, the director of Army staff — “absolute and unmitigated liars” for their characterization of the events of that day. Matthews has never publicly discussed the chaos of the Capitol siege.

On Jan. 6, Matthews was serving as the top attorney to Maj. Gen. William Walker, then commanding general of the D.C. National Guard. Matthews’ memo defends the Capitol attack response by Walker, who now serves as the House sergeant at arms, amplifying Walker’s previous congressional testimony about the hours long delay in the military’s order for the D.C. National Guard to deploy to the riot scene.“

Every leader in the D.C. Guard wanted to respond and knew they could respond to the riot at the seat of government” before they were given clearance to do so on Jan. 6, Matthews’ memo reads. Instead, he said, D.C. guard officials “set [sic] stunned watching in the Armory” during the first hours of the attack on Congress during its certification of the 2020 election results.

Matthews’ memo levels major accusations: that Flynn and Piatt lied to Congress about their response to pleas for the D.C. Guard to quickly be deployed on Jan. 6; that the Pentagon inspector general’s November report on Army leadership’s response to the attack was “replete with factual inaccuracies”;and that the Army has created its own closely held revisionist document about the Capitol riot that’s “worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist.”

It’s amazing how far we have progressed in such a short time frame.

We have zero real checks and balances against the centralizers anymore. They own most of the isolated class (financial arena), a vast majority of the SCMs (cultural arena), a major chunk of the politburo (political arena), and are paying off likely around a majority of the intelligentsia (intellectual arena).

Any of these arenas can outright lie and have no problems because of it. The intelligentsia has been lying about covid for two years, the SCMs have been pushing cultural degeneracy on us for decades without repercussion or pushback, the isolated class lie about everything they sell us, and the politburo outright just rigged an election, with proof from Arizona, to no punishments.

I find it hard to argue that we are still a rule by many. It was pretty debatable to argue up until the covid pandemic started that we were a degenerative rule by many form of government. To be fair, pre-covid the intelligentsia was much less vocally consolidated, there were far more isolated class competitors, and we at least felt like we had some political potential with Trump.

But now? Honestly, I find it hilarious to even consider it. We’re a rule by few. We are component centralized.

The centralizer groups have every major societal arena (the four above: political, financial, cultural, and intellectual) component centralized. That is a rule by few. They aren’t absolute centralized yet, so it’s not a rule by one, but we’re getting there. There isn’t a “one” centralized arena yet, but they are all working in their collective interest to eventually get there. The one is coming. Probably within our lifetime.

The question is: Is it going to be “our” one (a populist)? Or will it be one of their own?

I’d much prefer if we could break out of the cycle altogether, but given our current state of decay and the fact that they can lie about everything constantly, it’s not looking great. At this point, we need to buy ourselves some time.

Read Next:

Status Update On The Enclavism Book

The Three Essentials That Make Legacy-Enduring Societies

Another Day, Another Covid “Conspiracy” Turns Out To Be True

If you enjoyed this article, bookmark the website and check back often for new content. New articles most weekdays.

You can also keep up with my writing by joining my monthly newsletter.

Help fight the censorship – Share this article!