They Are Openly Flaunting The Election Fraud Now
First, they called it a conspiracy. Then, they called it domestic terrorism. Now, they are openly flaunting the election fraud.
Share
Openly Flaunting The Election Fraud
In November and December, they denied the election fraud and said it was a conspiracy.
In January, they claimed any mention of election fraud was equivalent to domestic terrorism and incitement to violence.
Now, in February, they are openly flaunting that they stole it.
It is sad what the country has become under this ruling caste.
Some highlights from their glaring omission:
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
Instead, an eerie quiet descended. As President Trump refused to concede, the response was not mass action but crickets. When media organizations called the race for Joe Biden on Nov. 7, jubilation broke out instead, as people thronged cities across the U.S. to celebrate the democratic process that resulted in Trump’s ouster.
It is truthfully amazing how insulated these individuals are. To believe that mass “jubilation” broke out while not recognizing that Trump received even more votes than he did the first time. They are fully insulated in their bubble.
Also note for later the “shadow campaign” title.
A second odd thing happened amid Trump’s attempts to reverse the result: corporate America turned on him. Hundreds of major business leaders, many of whom had backed Trump’s candidacy and supported his policies, called on him to concede. To the President, something felt amiss. “It was all very, very strange,” Trump said on Dec. 2. “Within days after the election, we witnessed an orchestrated effort to anoint the winner, even while many key states were still being counted.”
In a way, Trump was right.
Of course they turned on him, it was by design. We are ruled by a cabal. Centralizers exist among all institutions in degenerating rule by many governments.
This was no surprise to people that understand anacyclosis.
There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes, one that both curtailed the protests and coordinated the resistance from CEOs. Both surprises were the result of an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans. The pact was formalized in a terse, little-noticed joint statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and AFL-CIO published on Election Day. Both sides would come to see it as a sort of implicit bargain–inspired by the summer’s massive, sometimes destructive racial-justice protests–in which the forces of labor came together with the forces of capital to keep the peace and oppose Trump’s assault on democracy.
Note the obvious use of narrative shifting. It isn’t us who is assaulting democracy by thwarting the will of the voters, no, it’s Trump.
They always project what they themselves do.
The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election–an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted.
…
The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory.
Shadow campaign. Because democracy dies in darkness, or something. Except orange man bad.
Their work touched every aspect of the election. They got states to change voting systems and laws and helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding. They fended off voter-suppression lawsuits, recruited armies of poll workers and got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time. They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears. They executed national public-awareness campaigns that helped Americans understand how the vote count would unfold over days or weeks, preventing Trump’s conspiracy theories and false claims of victory from getting more traction. After Election Day, they monitored every pressure point to ensure that Trump could not overturn the result.
Ignoring the obvious fact that the second sentence is a direct concession of fraud, this entire ramble is still a hilarious observation. They did everything they could to “protect” democracy, while in the process completely revoking it.
For Trump and his allies were running their own campaign to spoil the election. The President spent months insisting that mail ballots were a Democratic plot and the election would be “rigged.”
Which they were. The author just stated in the previous paragraph that they changed voting laws (which overwhelming favored mail-in voting) and produced significant anomalies that didn’t even receive an audit. It was rigged on that stance alone.
If those laws hadn’t changed, there is no way Biden would have won from that simple fact alone.
Little did the President realize that that wasn’t their only plan, either. They were throwing everything they could at him. It was rigged from the start.
This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group’s inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster.
It was a conspiracy alright.
And instead of residing under the correctly elected president, we now remain under complete complete of centralizers. Truly, what strong levels of disaster aversion.
That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.
The bolded part is a direct quote from the article, believe it or not.
It is pretty much the exact definition of a centralizer. Along with further proof that they are the issue. Until the centralizers are taken care of, no manner of governmental process or democratic action can occur as normal. They will always inhibit, degrade, and attempt to dominate it.
They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.
The next time we rob a bank, let’s make sure we claim we’re not rigging anything. We’re just fortifying our financial positions.
It goes without saying, but I’ll say it anyway: If a governmental system needs to be “fortified”, especially by a cabal of elites, it’s a shitty system to begin with.
Anyway, the article ends here.
For more info on the actual fraud that occurred, you can start at hereistheevidence:
Due to the irregularity of this current 2020 Presidential Election, this is a crowdsourcing tool for organizing anomalies and legal issues. Our desire is that more of the election process would be made transparent so there would be unquestionable confidence in our voting systems.
This is for aggregating publicly available items of evidence that would be admissible in court, not general election news stories or updates.
2,036,041 Ballots Touched By Anomalies
923 Fact Witnesses
50+ Courts Blocked An Evidentiary Hearing
GOP plaintiff prevailed on 14 of the 21 cases decided on the merits.
112,516 mail-in ballots have had multiple return dates, 65,026 were received after November 3rd, 15,517 after the November 6th.
…
1. Ballot Integrity Procedures and Laws are part of every modern democracy to ensure election integrity.
2. 89% of European democracies banned absentee voting to resident citizens, while 100% require Photo ID for any form of voting to prevent targeted fraud.
3. 37 states in the US altered their absentee/mail-in ballots Ballot Integrity Procedures for 2020 Presidential Election.
…
4. The altered Ballot Integrity Procedures reduced the rate of illegal ballots caught by Officials this election.
5. With the same Ballot Integrity Procedures as 2018, swing states would have found upwards of 30x more illegal ballots.
6. Vice President Biden’s margin of victory in 4 swing states appears to rely on the altered Ballot Integrity Procedures these states enacted for this election.
7. Vice President Biden would not maintain his victory in 2 (possibly 4) swing states if the Ballot Integrity Procedures were the same as 2018.
8. A court in Arizon had two handwriting expert witnesses evaluated the signatures on 100 random absentee ballots.
9. The Republican expert witness found 6% of signatures on the 100 ballots where problematic.
10. The Democrat expert witness found 9% of signatures on the 100 ballots where problematic.
11. Vice President Biden would likely not maintain his victory in Arizona if the Ballot Integrity Procedures had caught the estimated problematic ballots.
Or go to one of my numerous articles:
- The Nine Key Points Of Election Fraud So Far
- Evidence of Voter Fraud in The 2020 Election Keeps Piling Up
- Comparing Voter Machines Versus Slot Machines
- Comprehensive List of Voting Fraud
- The Sheer Level Of Voting Fraud (And Coverup) is Insane
- Yet Another Recap on Electoral Fraud
Also, Mike Lindell recently released a documentary about the election fraud titled “Absolute Proof”. You can find it on his website here or BitChute. I haven’t had the time to watch it yet, so I can’t vouch for its contents.
Finally, as a good send off, you should watch this short 7 minute clip by Gateway Pundit of a white van showing up and unloading ballots at a Michigan polling place in the dead of night on Nov 4 when the media and the authorities had stated that “everyone has already gone home for the night”.
Sure they did. Which is when the “well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information” came in and started dumping ballots.
It’s obvious to those of us that pay close attention to politics to know that fraud occurred. Honestly, it’s somewhat insane to even consider otherwise. The anomalies are too numerous to immediately accept the result without question. At this point, it’s more reasonable to at least lean toward the Doubt position.
But that is the problem. The centralizers control everything. So, we can’t even question it. Or we’re domestic terrorists.
Hard times are coming. Prepare yourself.
Read Next:
Opinion-Molding Operations Part 2
Stock Traders Figure Out That Centralizers Exist and Are Not Their Friends (Saturday Special)
If you enjoyed this article, bookmark the website and check back often for new content. New articles most weekdays.
You can also keep up with my writing by joining my monthly newsletter.
Help fight the censorship – Share this article!
Stay informed, subscribe now!
(Learn More About The Dominion Newsletter Here)