Most Recent News


Popular News



Welcome to the Quick Read Feed for the Hidden Dominion.
This section provides our readers access to our articles using a traditional blog layout.
This ‘old fashion style’ blog layout has its advantages, mostly in being able to quickly skim and catch up on a week’s worth of articles on one page. I’ve had a few requests for this more traditional layout, so here it is. The articles are the same as published traditionally on our homepage.
If you prefer a single page to catch up on recent articles, or if you just prefer the more traditional blog layout, consider bookmarking this page to use as your primary source for new articles.
I am ready to catch some flake for this one, but bring it on. It is good to rattle the cage a bit occasionally.
I have been a ‘dissident but also against the anti-gov crowd’ (ironic, and possibly absolutely absurd/contradictory) for years now. But let me first explain.
For instance, in “The Blind Fear Of Government Misses The Mark”, I wrote:
Older generations have this innate fear of government which blindsides them to the fear they should have: of all centralizers. The government is certainly one piece to the puzzle of tyranny, but it’s not the only one, nor the only path to it. Ironically, the government is the only piece that is actually at least somewhat accountable to the populace. International corporations, cultural markers, and the intelligentsia certainly aren’t in any respect.
[…]
The older generations have kept a watchful eye to make sure government doesn’t overstep its bounds. Even if that means letting corporations, cultural institutions, and the intelligentsia trample over them with absolutely no restrictions. “That’s fine, so long as the government isn’t the one doing it”, they said. But the end result is the same: authoritarianism. Just procured through different initial means.
They missed the mark, because eventually these centralizers will get powerful enough that they can indirectly control that government through various means within their own arena. And once they have every single power institution in the nation, it doesn’t matter what the people think or do anymore. It’s irrelevant.
It’s the slogan: “Don’t tread on me”, solely directed at the government. But apparently when every cultural institution, institutional authority, and corporation treads on them, then it’s fine. We don’t want the government lining us up against the wall, but if corporations starve us to death and cultural institutions enact a vigilant-witchhunt against us, that’s just “freedom”.
[…]
The problem, as always, is the centralizers. All of them, not [just the government].
Not only do I still agree with this, but I feel even more strongly about it now. The state is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. If you only focus on that piece, you’ll miss the greater picture.
The imaginary older generation boogeyman of the “government” is not our only enemy, or even our primary one. The worst elites are embedded outside of the state; hiding in financial, geopolitical, and cultural positions.
Because of this, I am a contrarian on the widespread ‘anti-government employees’ narrative found on the Right (in both mainstream and dissident circles).
I do not hate government employees. In fact, I do not really think they are much of a problem at all.
Even further, I like a lot of them. And I encourage our guys to join their ranks where possible. We should be taking over the institutions, not abandoning them.
Of course, the state is no friend to us. We have plenty that are bad. Federal agents in the DHS/FBI or CIA operatives are probably not somebody I would become best friends with. Or even want to know in my personal life.
But they are the exception when you speak about government employees. The average Fed is somebody maybe making the median income while working some desk job somewhere. They manage BLM land or do some data stuff with social security.
The average Fed is not some special agent hunting you down for not paying your taxes. That is less than 1% of all Feds.
The average Fed is not exactly a nefarious enemy of the people.
But if you listen to demons like Elon Musk, you would think government employees are simultaneously maliciously targeting all of us Americans with all of their might—and never actually doing any real work at all—both at the same time. Somehow. Magically.
Just read ridiculous pieces like this one (People genuinely think like this):
“The Manhattan Project” Of Our Time: Musk And Vivek Ramaswamy To Head Department Of Government Efficiency (DOGE)
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have been selected by President-elect Donald Trump to head the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where they will “slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures, and restructure Federal Agencies,” according to an official release from the Trump-Vance transition team, which called this “potentially, the “Manhattan Project” of our time.”
According to the statement, “Their work will conclude no later than July 4, 2026” – the nation’s 250th anniversary.
Musk previously predicted he could cut at least $2 trillion from the US federal budget, while Ramaswamy suggested firing federal workers based on their social security numbers.
“Here’s how: if your [Social Security number] ends in an odd number, you’re fired,” he wrote on X.
In September, Ramaswamy told podcaster Lex Fridman: “Get in there on day one, say that anybody in the federal bureaucracy who is not elected, elected representatives obviously were elected by the people, but the people who are not elected, if your social security number ends in an odd number, you’re out, if it ends in an even number, you’re in. There’s a 50% cut right there. Of those who remain, if your social security number starts in an even number, you’re in and if it starts with an odd number, you’re out. Boom. That’s a 75% reduction done. Literally, stochastically, okay, one of the virtues of that, it’s a thought experiment, not a policy prescription, but one of the virtues of that thought experiment is that you don’t have a bunch of lawsuits you’re dealing with about gender discrimination or racial discrimination or political viewpoint discrimination.”
Personally, I would prefer to fire foreigners like Ramaswamy rather than our own people. But apparently I am just out here in the [right] field, all alone, even among many other dissidents.
Below, I summarize my take on the DOGE/Anti-Government Employees lunacy for those who won’t take the time to read the full piece:
Nearly everything these guys are saying is false, by the way. It is just an outright lie. They use the stereotypical narrative of ‘lazy government employees just soaking up all the private sector wealth’ that the boomers invented in the 1970s.
But time has passed. It is no longer the age of hippies, a majority white California, and disco. Things have changed.
Also, whether or not anyone likes it, the actual data does not support their theories.
A long time ago, I did a thorough analysis into the subject because I was curious. As it turns out, government employees actually do not even take that much of the overall budget.
Even if you fired half of government employees, it really wouldn’t do anything to our overall debt problem. Our money problem goes a lot deeper than paying for Sally at the post office to sort mail for $15 an hour. We simply aren’t spending that much on the Feds.
Face the facts, even if you aren’t happy about it:
Out of the $6 trillion in annual spending, ~$305 billion (debatable) comprises federal employees’ payroll (excluding military personnel). That amounts to just 4% of the budget.
Why is the new focus on the 4% and not the other 96% of expenditure?
Why is everyone so focused on harming our own people, making the 4% and not focused on the corrupt system that allows an outside 96%?
Government jobs are not increasing in amount or cost compared to the past. They track consistently with inflation. Why the sudden concern now?
What this is, is clear (to me): it is a libertarian-type virtue signaling about a nonproblem. Which also serves to distract us from the real problems impacting us that I listed above.
Additionally, it goes even deeper than that.
Does no one see the connection that the wealthy elite want to fire a bunch of government employees, but then increase the amount of H-1Bs? Am I the only one not blind here?
These guys want to fire federal employee Sheniqua so that they can replace her with a federal contractor on an H-1B just off the plane from SomaliTurkHinduIstan.
These elites also care more about reducing the amount of regulations targeting them, and reducing the amount of federal employees who would actually enforce regulations against them. Two things that are NOT major cost centers for the U.S. gov, but are suspiciously the Musk-types’ priority focus. This won’t reduce the debt by any meaningful sense, but it surely will make them wealthier and more powerful, with fewer people keeping them accountable.
And this is good for us? How? How does randomly harming your fellow citizens help you out? Please tell me how does helping the isolated class run even more amok without regulations help us out?
It is clear why the elites are targeting government employees and regulations. It is not because it will reduce government operating costs.
Open your eyes. It is clearly for their own benefit at the cost of our own people working in those jobs.
Also, does anyone seriously think the government would just not spend that money? Do you really think they are going to put that money in the savings bank or use it to pay off the debt? If so, call me, ’cause I have an ocean to sell you on Mars.
I know we have a trend in the dissident sphere to think “private sector = production” and “public sector = leeches”, but this is the mindset of someone from the 60s or 70s. Stop holding on to that ancient mindset. The world has changed.
Guess what? Private is just as bad. The reality is that there are incredibly few “producers” at all (in the strict legalistic sense) since the U.S. transitioned into a knowledge economy. I don’t know what to say besides get over it; stop living in the past. It is what it is.
Before anyone gets all huffy, this is coming from someone that would be considered a “producer” based on my career in the medical field. Which I will use as an example.
Working in healthcare, we have over 70% of employees that are “admin”. They do nothing. They sit around all day playing on their computers. Most work in HR, legalism, or contracts. I know it is hard to accept, but they aren’t public employees. Yet they are just as “worthless” and “unnecessary” in the production sense.
I have a couple extended family that work state and fed. They are exceptional employees and work harder than any admin people I see on the medical side.
These medical admin positions did not exist fifty years ago (admin positions have exploded compared to every other job field). They do not differ from the public sector, except your money gets siphoned there through increased healthcare expenses rather than taxes. But the result is the same.
To think that all laziness and welfare jobs are only in the public sector is to still be living in the past. It’s the new Boomer-Gen X mindset.
As a dissident especially, this should be obvious. The majority of our most active opponents against us are not even public. They are in private. The NGOs importing migrants here, groups like the ADL and SPLC, and evil billionaires are doing far more harm than the Department of Mining or whatever. They control far more and are a far higher threat.
Definitely far more than some low-level government employee working in the behemoth system. It’s not even comparable.
I am no fan of unions, but the AFGE has a solid writeup on the actual facts regarding common misconceptions of feds. Here is a snapshot from it:
Myth:
The federal government is too centralized in the Washington area, and relocating agencies around the country will make it more effective.
Fact:
Just 15% of our nation’s 2 million federal workers live in the Washington, D.C. metro area. The remaining 85% already live across the country, in all 50 states, in big cities and rural areas, on military installations and in our communities, and everywhere in-between.
Myth:
The bloated federal workforce is at an all-time high.
Fact:
Over the past 50 years, the number of federal workers has grown by roughly 6%. At the same time, the U.S. population has increased by 57%. The ratio of federal workers to national population has steadily decreased for the more than a half-century at this point. In 2024, the total federal workforce compensation of $293 billion amounted to just 4.3% of the federal budget. Meanwhile, federal contractors accounted for $759.2 billion, or 11.4%. If federal workers were paid equally to private sector workers, their pay would make up a 10% share of the budget.
Myth:
Federal workers are overpaid.
Fact:
Federal workers earn nearly 25% less than private sector and state and local workers who perform similar jobs.
Myth:
Federal workers don’t seem to understand or care who they work for.
Fact:
About 642,000 federal workers are veterans of the U.S. military. More than half (58%) of all federal workers hold jobs that directly support our troops (Army, Navy, Air Force, DoD), our veterans (VA), or our seniors (SSA, CMS). Federal workers know better than anyone who they work for – the American people – because they devote every single day to delivering vital public services that hundreds of millions of American rely on. They do not cater to any corporate contractor’s bottom line; they serve only their fellow American citizens.
Myth:
Federal workers have “fake jobs.”
Fact:
Federal workers perform essential work on behalf of everyone who calls this nation home. They’re the doctors and nurses who care for our veterans, the people who get Social Security benefits out on time, the corrections officers in federal prisons who protect us from dangerous criminals, the USDA inspectors who make sure our food supply is safe, the FEMA specialists who assist disaster survivors, the TSA screeners who protect the flying public, the border patrol agents who stop drug smugglers and human traffickers, and so much more.
Myth:
We only have 6% of our federal workforce actually going into work every single day.
Fact:
54% of federal workers hold jobs that require them to report in-person to their duty station every day… Among those whose jobs permit telework, 61.2% of working hours are spent in-person.
Myth:
Americans are being put on hold by bureaucrats who are phoning it in.
Fact:
Mischaracterizing telework as failing to show up for work is a deliberate attempt to demean and disparage federal workers and ultimately eliminate and/or outsource their jobs. Both private and public sector employers have found that hybrid telework arrangements improves employee engagement, recruitment and retention. Hybrid work arrangements actually reduce wait times and allow better service for citizens.
Myth:
Federal workers are low-skill workers who would be unqualified for private sector employment.
Fact:
Federal workers are both highly skilled and highly qualified. 66% of the federal workforce has a bachelor’s degree, compared to 43% of private sector workers, while 33% of federal workers have an advanced degree, compared to just 15% of private sector workers.
Myth:
98% federal bureaucrats are enrolled in a taxpayer-funded pension (compared to just 15% of private sector employees with access to a defined benefit pension plan). That locks federal employees into government employment & comes with a massive cost: nearly $1.2 trillion in unfunded liabilities for the main federal pension system. The cost of pensions is a key reason why most employers have moved away from them.
Fact:
While federal pay continues to lag far behind private sector pay, the average yearly pension for Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) retirees is just $25,000. As it stands, those benefits are no match for rising costs and exorbitant health care expenses that many seniors face. Yet, even as President-elect Trump, Elon Musk, and Ramaswamy plan to extend tax cuts and handouts to the wealthy, they are plotting to cut the key retirement benefits that federal workers have earned.
Like it or not, these are the facts on the ground. Most of the anti-gov positions are entirely fake narratives created to make you hate your fellow American unjustifiably. Deal with that as you will.
Then this entire debacle just gets worse with the anti-work from home positions.
Supposedly, part of the “solution” to our problems is to cut off remote and telework opportunities. That is likely what Trump is going to do Day 1.
But this will only cause those that have options to leave (i.e., the good ones) to leave, leaving the worst government employees left behind. You know Jamal won’t care about going in and playing on his phone at the office, but Fred the expert data analyst will probably find another option.
Not only will this not help crash the government because the system knows how to chug along regardless of the pawns, but it will make our nonfederal lives more miserable too. The worst of the worst will control all government institutions.
How can anybody look at this and think this is a good idea?
I simply don’t understand how conservatives can encourage everyone to flee every single institution that matters all the time and then expect us to win. I’ve always encouraged the opposite: Get into the gov or corrupt institutions if you can and find out what is going on in there! Fight the good fight from the inside. Don’t run and then complain when they are dominated by non-whites and people that hate us.
That’s how we lost the institutions in the first place, geniuses. What an absolutely insane position to take.
I’ve spoken on this plenty previously:
The government (system) is certainly not our friend, but willingly making it worse and handing it over even more to the enemy does no one any favors. All of these proposals (terminate employees, mandate return to office, etc.) are simply more ways for the elites to whip their slaves (our people!).
Yet, we have people on our own side cheering it on. Fools!
Screwing over government employees (or any true American just trying to get by) does not help any of our people. It will not reduce taxes or make our lives any easier when they have to interact with government agencies. You’re just harming your fellow citizens for no reason at the benefit of the elites.
These approaches don’t fix any root issues. The system itself is the problem. Only by fixing the system can we truly fix anything.
Targeting government employees is only going to benefit the elite. The same elite who will force more of their serfs back into the office or on welfare. Then those elites will laugh as old Joe gets laid off who is just trying to help his state preserve its beauty at the Forest Service and struggles to pay his mortgage. Meanwhile, the elite will receive even greater tax cuts and less investigation by state agencies.
The fact that people can be tricked into thinking this is a good idea shows how fragile people’s genuine convictions are. And how weak our love for our people is.
At the end of it all, government employees are not our enemy. They are the very same grey masses that we find in the private sector. Our people in both sectors just need a better shepherd and system. If they had that, they would work for the excellent system, instead of the bad.
Think of them as an opportunity, not an enemy. Stop attacking your own people, stay focused on the enemy.
These are just my opinions on this subject. I know many of you will disagree, and that is fine. But I stand where I stand.
As for the government employees: I love my people, no matter where you work. Do good work. Honor the Lord. Take over the institutions. Don’t lose heart with these attacks; some of us stand behind you wherever you are.
As for the “conservative” and “dissident” groups in favor of these things: How about we take the side of our people, and not the corporate elite billionaires, just one damn time? Is that too much to ask?
If you enjoyed this article, bookmark the website and check back often for new content. New articles most weekdays.
You can also keep up with my writing by joining my monthly newsletter.
Help fight the censorship – Share this article!
Alright, so let’s admit this upfront: This meme is definitely somewhat normie-tier, maybe even cringe-tier, but it is still kind of fun, nonetheless.
I think the answer could tell a lot about a dissident’s priorities.
Let’s try it out.
Some forums have mentioned that this is a “difficult answer”. I’ve seen lots of combos including Biden due to his immigration disaster. Some target both of the Soros snakes. Tons of combinations, really.
Still, it was not a difficult one for me. My choice:
Both of them are the true power behind the puppets. My concern is removing the root of the corruption, and the root is hidden below the tree. Most of these pawns are simply flesh-suits for the ones with actual power (I’m talking Kamala, old grandpa from Minnesota, random black rapper, Pelosi, etc.) They aren’t actually important at all, except as mouthpieces.
Fink especially would be an essential for me. BlackRock is an arch-enemy. Not just of me, but of mankind:
So those two would be the highest priority for me. Still, I’d take what I can get with convictions on any of them. I wager most combinations are valid, given a difference in immediate priorities.
Who would you pick?
If you enjoyed this article, bookmark the website and check back often for new content. New articles most weekdays.
You can also keep up with my writing by joining my monthly newsletter.
Help fight the censorship – Share this article!
The inevitable schism of Americans continues.
This time, due to the very same technology that was meant to erase “differences” and “support diversity”:
This is just one example. If you are in any way adjacent to the housing/relocation industry, you know this stuff is popping up everywhere. Political polarization in living locations is becoming the norm.
It is only going to increase in frequency from here.
There’s some that are upset with these new developments. I am not one of them.
Changes like this are essential and inevitable. In fact, it is what we should want. We want our own to have their own place. To be able to congregate there in peace.
In more ways than not, this is the enclave idea: To carve out your own little local arena and to be able to sustain it using tools like this to keep those who would distort it out. A community with the same mindset and goals. How powerful even just a few of those communities could be!
Of course, given the debased nature of our government, this could potentially put a target on our backs. But the way I see it, the target is already there, anyway. Better to have that target as a community than alone as an individual. It is better to have an enclave with your people than to be targeted alone.
An upcoming schism is inevitable. We are splintering; that much is obvious. The sooner these things become widespread, the faster we can find our own people before that schism occurs.
Find your people while you can. Don’t neglect to use these tools when doing so.
If you enjoyed this article, bookmark the website and check back often for new content. New articles most weekdays.
You can also keep up with my writing by joining my monthly newsletter.
Help fight the censorship – Share this article!
The world is preoccupied with ungodly animalistic joys. But especially the Western World.
Our entire foundation rests on the individualist principle of maximizing material wealth. Mammon is the central object with the strongest gravitational pull that forces everything in our society to revolve around it.
Our illusory financial system controls us more than anyone could fathom.
Everywhere you look, it is only greed and the pursuit of more money that matters. Even our own people are too busy with foolish things like fighting about GDP and so-called “immigrant rights” (to acquire subservient foreigners who will cost less and work more for the elites) to see the writing on the wall of our demise.
While our nation is being slowly murdered, the vultures are even selling off parts of the future corpse.
The conquest for “better” (an incredibly relative word) or “larger” or “finer” never ends. The appetite can never be truly quenched when the source is one of indulgence and debauchery.
Each man lives only for himself. Self-destructive individualism is the inevitable result of such a heart.
Each man has only ego and self as the focus. This has led to man becoming akin to a mindless hyena—a corrupt snake—not worthy of the title “man”.
There is really only one way out of this folly. It is to reject the foundations that placed us in it. Because we reached this conclusion by logically following the premise. If the only goal is self-maximizing wealth and material prosperity, there is no way to escape the degeneracy of the modern world. This is its logical result.
Which is the greatest irony of all: The logical result is self-immolation on a national scale. There is no way to sustain it. We greed through the desire to consume more; until the greed itself consumes us.
To escape, we must be retaught the basics. We must relearn the correct foundation.
We live in an age where almost all men live solely for themselves. The only way for this condition to be fixed is for man to no longer in a debased state like this, but to instead live as a collective as God intended. Live for others; die to self.
The New Jerusalem in Revelation 21 is regarded as a city. This is significant and symbolic. It is not symbolized as a scattered rural town or as hiding out in the woods alone. God’s people, once restored, will live in a symbolic city—A place that symbolizes community and social interaction. We won’t be alone in the woods. Neither will those in hell. We are social creatures, not meant to live and die alone.
We are to live and love our people.
Individualism, a tool of Satan, has stripped us of this reality. God will one day fix it, but until then, we can bring an aspect of that Kingdom of God down to us on earth right now by adopting that Kingdom mindset. One of a communitarian (neither collectivist nor individualist) mindset. And by learning to adhere to the list above.
It starts with you. Be that better man. Return to the traditions that once housed a saner world.
We don’t need everyone to do so. Only a select few. The majority is insignificant in the waves of history. Those who matter are the active minority. You can, and must, become that remnant.
Even just a few thousand with a mindset like this will be enough to bring about the change we need to begin the reconquest of our heritage and people.
The modern world is wicked and hopelessly corrupt. But that does not matter to us, because we know it must end. Which provides hope, and a desire to fight on.
There is only one way out, and that is through.
If you enjoyed this article, bookmark the website and check back often for new content. New articles most weekdays.
You can also keep up with my writing by joining my monthly newsletter.
Help fight the censorship – Share this article!
Congratulations! If you are reading this, you made it to another year. 2024 is now in the rearview mirror.
So let me (maybe) be the first to say to you: Welcome to the year of our Lord, 2025.
There were quite a few big happenings of the year, but overall it was a bit of a sleeper year compared to years like 2020.
2024 will go down as somewhere in the middle of the “happening”-meter: It was active, but not world-shattering. Some events from 2024 could certainly lead to world-altering changes in 2025, but we got through 2024 relatively unscathed. No major economic depression, no major U.S. war, and no Cataclysm X. I would call that a good year.
It’s always good (and fun) to recap the year. So, let’s take a stroll through all the big events of this year. At the end, we will of course make some predictions for 2025. I want to hear your predictions too, so please leave them in the comments.
Now, we look solely to the New Year ahead. What is in the past is behind us. It is time to move forward.
I’m sitting here wrapping up this article with a quality cigar in hand, sending you a personal cheers to the New Year. Enjoy that cheers whenever you may read this. I pray this year is a good year for you.
As always, let me know your own 2025 predictions in the comments or in an email.
If you enjoyed this article, bookmark the website and check back often for new content. New articles most weekdays.
You can also keep up with my writing by joining my monthly newsletter.
Help fight the censorship – Share this article!
Merry Christmas to all of my readers.
It is my hope that you all have a pleasant holiday and (hopefully) some rest during this season.
Instead of sharing my usual Christmas message, I thought it would be interesting to change things up and take a stroll through the Church’s early history of Christmas, instead. Most people do not know this history of Christmas, so hopefully it will be enlightening.
Consider it a gift of knowledge.
The origins of Christmas are not what most expect. But it’s become a great Holy Day worthy of research.
The Incarnation remains a beautiful mystery, and equally so the history of Christmas is also illusive.
But here is what we do know. Below is a solid writeup on the known history from our forefathers:
The History Of Christmas From The Church Fathers
The celebration of Christmas (the Feast of the Nativity) as we know it took shape gradually in the early centuries of the Church. While our earliest sources from the second and early third centuries do not describe a widespread or uniform observance of Jesus’s birth, some Church Fathers did weigh in—whether explicitly on the Nativity or implicitly through discussions that helped solidify the tradition. Below is an overview of what a few major early Christian writers said (or did not say) on the topic of Christmas.
1. Clement of Alexandria (c. 150–c. 215)
- Various Proposed Dates:
In his Stromata (Book I, Chapter 21), Clement of Alexandria mentions various dates that different groups of Christians in Egypt proposed for Christ’s birth: some pointed to May 20, some to April 19 or 20, and others to January 6 (later associated with Epiphany). Notably, Clement does not mention December 25 at all, indicating that there was no universal consensus at this time and that December 25 was not yet a fixed date for the celebration.- No Dedicated Feast Described:
Clement does not describe a distinct, widely celebrated festival akin to what became “Christmas.” Instead, he merely records that Christians speculated about the date of Jesus’s birth, reflecting the variety of local traditions in the late second/early third century.2. Origen of Alexandria (c. 184–c. 253)
- Skepticism About Birthdays:
Origen, in a homily preserved by Eusebius (though the exact text is somewhat debated), questioned the custom of celebrating birthdays in general, noting that in Scripture, birthdays were more commonly associated with pagan or secular rulers (e.g., Pharaoh, Herod) than with the saints. He even declared that only sinners, not saints, celebrated birthdays.- Implication for Christmas:
Because of Origen’s views, it is not surprising that we find no early third-century endorsement of a liturgical “birthday of Christ” festival. Later centuries, however, gradually came to hold Jesus’s Nativity in high honor.3. Hippolytus of Rome (c. 170–c. 235)
- Earliest Reference to December 25?
One of the earliest possible references to December 25 as the date of Jesus’s birth is found in what is often attributed to Hippolytus’s Commentary on Daniel. He seems to argue that Christ’s conception took place on March 25 (the traditional date of the Annunciation), thus placing His birth nine months later on December 25.“For the first advent of our Lord in the flesh, when he was born in Bethlehem, was December 25th…”
The authenticity of parts of this commentary is debated among scholars, but if genuine, Hippolytus provides one of the earliest witnesses to the December 25 dating.4. Tertullian of Carthage (c. 160–c. 220)
- Focus on the Pascha (Easter):
Tertullian discusses dates relating to Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection in great detail (e.g., in Adversus Iudaeos and other treatises) but says very little about a distinct feast of the Nativity.- Linking Conception and Death:
Later in Church tradition, there emerged an idea that March 25 was both the date of the Annunciation (Christ’s conception) and the date of the crucifixion. Some see the roots of this association in Tertullian’s works, though Tertullian himself never draws out a formal “Christmas” date.5. The Shift in the Fourth Century
By the early to mid-fourth century, references to a feast for Christ’s Nativity on December 25 become much more common. This marks the period when the celebration of the Nativity was beginning to be more standardized, especially in the West (Rome) and soon in the East as well (though some Eastern churches initially preferred January 6, celebrated as Epiphany or Theophany).
St. John Chrysostom (c. 347–407)
- Sermons on the Nativity:
Chrysostom, preaching in Antioch (and later in Constantinople), gave homilies specifically on December 25 as the birth of Christ. In a famous Nativity sermon (likely around 386 in Antioch), he praised the Western Church for having preserved December 25 as the date of Jesus’s birth and urged his congregation to adopt the same feast.“This day surpasses all wonders of creation…”St. Augustine of Hippo (354–430)
- Affirmation of the December 25 Date:
Augustine, writing in North Africa, frequently references the feast of the Nativity on December 25, connecting it with theological themes of Christ’s incarnation. He accepts the date as an established fact and focuses more on the spiritual meaning of the Incarnation.St. Gregory Nazianzen (329–390) and St. Gregory of Nyssa (335–395)
- Orations on the Theophany/Nativity:
In the East, the lines between the Nativity (December 25) and the Epiphany (January 6) were sometimes blurred. Gregory Nazianzen and Gregory of Nyssa each delivered orations which celebrate Christ’s appearance to the world (Theophany), including his birth. Over time, the Eastern churches largely separated the two feasts, reserving December 25 for the Nativity and January 6 for the Baptism of the Lord (and sometimes the visit of the Magi).Key Takeaways
- No Universal Early Celebration: In the second and early third centuries, there was no universally celebrated “Christmas” feast. Writers like Clement of Alexandria note various proposed dates and Origen shows disinterest (or disapproval) toward celebrating birthdays at all.
- Gradual Adoption of December 25: A pivotal development is seen in Hippolytus of Rome, who may provide our earliest explicit mention of December 25. By the fourth century, major Church Fathers in both East and West (e.g., John Chrysostom, Augustine) affirm and celebrate December 25 as the official feast of the Nativity.
- Importance of Incarnation Theology: Once the Feast of the Nativity took root, it was seen not simply as a “birthday party” but as a theological celebration of the Incarnation, closely tied to Easter in its significance for salvation history.
- Regional Variations: Even as December 25 gained acceptance in the West, some Eastern regions focused on January 6 (Epiphany/Theophany) for commemorating both the birth and the baptism of Christ. Over time, these feasts were delineated more clearly.
Conclusion
In sum, the earliest generations of Christians focused predominantly on Easter (the Paschal Mystery) rather than on a commemorative festival for Jesus’s birth. Writings from figures like Clement, Origen, and Tertullian either dismiss or do not mention a dedicated Nativity feast. By the early fourth century, however, December 25 emerged—likely due in part to theological chronologies connecting March 25 (Annunciation) with the Incarnation—and then was championed in sermons by Church Fathers such as John Chrysostom and Augustine. From that point onward, references to a distinct Feast of the Nativity (Christmas) appear regularly in patristic literature, reflecting the increasingly central place of Christ’s Incarnation in Christian worship and doctrine.
The exact date of the Incarnation, while interesting to dive into the history of, is not practically relevant. We celebrate it on this day, and that is enough. An eternal and infinite God has no need for a precise time or date. We, as humans, are trapped in time; God is both outside of it and the owner of time. Our celebrations for the Incarnation are relevant today and every other day we choose to worship.
I, for one, am thrilled about the fact that the early church developed this Holy Day over time. The more days of worship, the merrier.
Remember to keep the focus on Christ, Our Lord, today.
Even though the early church likely did not celebrate over Jesus’ birth in the exact way we do today, it is still a uniting day that connects us back with our Christian forefathers from millennia ago. That is a powerful tradition and a beautiful legacy.
God Bless and have a glorious New Year.
If you enjoyed this article, bookmark the website and check back often for new content. New articles most weekdays.
You can also keep up with my writing by joining my monthly newsletter.
Help fight the censorship – Share this article!
[NOTE: The Quick Read Feed is limited to a maximum of 10 pages of results to improve performance. We have plenty of older articles outside of this time range that can be found by searching below or heading over to the Post Archive. This section is designed more for active users wanting to view our recent articles in a different fashion, not a review of old pieces.]
(Learn More About The Dominion Newsletter Here)